That's an important question. There has been a lot of commentary to that effect, including by our Indian colleagues.
It's important to note that there are some commonalities between the case that is under way in the United States and that of Mr. Nijjar. There are also some big differences. In the case in the United States, what is under investigation is a conspiracy to murder. In the case of Canada, there has been a murder.
Secondly, it is the case that the U.S legal system differs in a couple of key ways from our own. The possibility for an early narrative and the disclosure of evidence through an indictment in the U.S. differs quite significantly from the legal process in Canada.
The point at which there would be an inflection point in a Canadian investigation, such that detailed information supporting the investigation can be released to the public or a foreign government, comes at a later stage. There is a kind of sequencing disjuncture. However, what we do know from the U.S. case, due to the indictment, is that there is a clear link being described by the evidence provided to date.