We have another explanation as well, but the most significant amount was for this particular system. I hope we will continue to receive money for that system, because it is meeting our goals. On the other hand, it is not connected to the other systems; we have to have what is known in English as a patch. It works adequately, but it doesn't allow us to move forward.
If the Committee would like, I can provide a more detailed explanation in writing with regards to the 26% budget increase.
As for the size of the public service, there is data with respect to appointments on pages 43 and 53 of our report, and the total population for the public service is given on page 44. We were very anxious to find out whether there had really been an increase.
For the year ending March 31, 2006, there are two different numbers. If the Canada Border Services Agency is included, the increase is more significant. However, if the Canada Border Services Agency is not included, the population only increased by 1.5%, which corresponds to the actual increase. So, there really isn't much change there.
In answer to your third question, I would say that, in my opinion, we do not have trouble attracting people to the public service, even though we have shortages in a few places. In such cases, we have to take special initiatives to recruit people. As well, we need a better human resources planning system, as well as a plan that will allow us to identify the areas where major shortages will occur. In that way, we will be in a better position to take special recruitment initiatives.