In that case, we'll make sure to give you concrete examples, if there are any, since this topic is of interest to you.
As regards the Boeing contract, at another standing committee, we heard Mr. O'Connor reply to colleagues that the transaction had to be done quickly in order to equip our armed forces, so on and so forth.
Did the expeditious nature of the transaction influence our negotiating power? Was our negotiating power at all compromised? We did not have 25 options, there was only one single one, and that was Boeing and the C-17 aircraft. How could we have any negotiating power with only one single option in play?