I'm wondering if you could tell us a bit about these sites and about the problem that does exist.
For some, it seems the problem is just capitalization. And as part of the real estate study that the Minister of Public Works was talking about before the committee, the 40 sites that we've recommended to the two sources outside who are looking at the federal government's real estate portfolio and looking for opportunities to recapitalize and how we can diminish approximately $4 billion in exposure that exists to taxpayers—And what you might recommend with regard to heritage sites in terms of the upkeep that needs to take place. The vast majority of heritage sites, you note, are well maintained and are moving forward. Of course some of them are in smaller, remote communities, so you can't charge people at gates in order to visit them, and raising money that way isn't the best way.
What would you recommend for the differing problems and the differing shortness of capital?