I think it's worth noting as well, Chair, when we go back to the shedding of jobs in 1995, that the reason was to save money.
What I'm seeing here is that we've got runaway costs for temporary help services that you could argue aren't saving money, because these are expenses when you're hiring people.
Again, I underline the fact that temporary help services have a role, no question. When you talk about what's happened with passports recently, I wish more were hired to do just that. But when we see that people are being hired for jobs like pharmacy and epidemiology, this is not a temporary help service.
Canadians should be shocked that those are the kinds of people being hired temporarily. That's what's happening, Chair. I think we need to address that.
The last point--I just wonder how much time I have left.