Thank you.
I want to get to the end of this as well. I'm wondering if we can't together do something constructive here. What I'm wondering is if we can make some amendments to this motion that we can all maybe live with. The way I would propose this is we would change the reading to:
That because this committee is not yet convinced of the benefits of leaseback for taxpayers, the committee ask the Department of Public Works and Government Services to provide the committee with additional relevant studies and information on the impact of these leasebacks.
The thing is, we take out the moratorium and we ask for more information. We aren't yet passing judgment, but we'll continue on the investigation with the hopes of getting additional information. The problem with saying that we're going to pass and push forward with the moratorium is this. If tomorrow certain members get additional information, they may be convinced, but they've already said there should be a moratorium. I think this is a positive alternative.