I would like to add something before I go to the next speaker.
I'm aware of one thing, and that is that the federal government hires a lot of temporary help, and a lot of full-time jobs come from those temporary contracts. That's part of the problem that Madame Nash talks about.
From what I see, it may also be because of the speed it takes to hire a full-time person. But they also limit themselves, because there is a pool of qualified people out there who are already working, perhaps not at the jobs they prefer, who would consider applying for these jobs, but they're not going to apply for a 12-week job if they already have a full-time job, no matter how much better it appears to be, because they don't know what's going to happen after.
I'm wondering whether the federal government shouldn't also reconsider its way of hiring and move away from these temporary jobs, because that's what you're seeing in a lot of cases: short-term contracts, temporary jobs, which can and often do lead to full-time work.