Here's the point. We know that in October 2006, in the middle of a municipal campaign in Toronto, a $350-million project was signed off, and this is a project that was in fact sole-sourced, and there were no such conditions placed making it contingent upon a future council. So it seems like we have two different treatments here, depending on what the file is.
This is the concern, more broadly. The explanation that has been given to date by Mr. Baird as to why he interfered in this process was that it was a boondoggle, using his words. Yet we have seven departments under this current government that signed off on this project, including Treasury Board itself on October 10, 2006, contingent upon a future council. Mr. Wouters, do you consider this project a boondoggle? Did your department sign off on a boondoggle? Did seven other federal departments sign off on a boondoggle, and if so, why?