Madam Chair, I don't feel very comfortable with this line of reasoning that's suddenly come forward. We have a work plan and that work plan includes the three meetings on the public appointments and how it happened with AECL, because the public wants some clarity. This isn't a fishing expedition. This is us doing our job so that we can actually get some clarity about how these issues are decided so that we can restore some confidence to the public. So we have that.
We had agreed we were going to take up Justice Gomery's challenge that no committee had looked at...two years from the Gomery report...and what recommendation is still needed. We've agreed to that. I understand that is in our work plan.
I don't remember anything about suddenly having to jump on accrual accounting until this morning. If Mr. Kramp wants to put it in the queue, certainly, but I don't think we need to have a special meeting to jump it to the head of the queue or anyplace else in the queue. We already have a number of motions coming forward, including Mr. Holland's, which is now on the list. If Mr. Kramp wants to bring accrual accounting somewhere down the road, I can't think of a subject I'd be more fascinated in spending some time on, but I just don't think in the next three weeks I'd be really keen.