Evidence of meeting #23 for Government Operations and Estimates in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was contracts.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Michael Fortier  Minister of Public Works and Government Services
Tim McGrath  Assistant Deputy Minister, Real Property Branch, Department of Public Works and Government Services
Liliane saint pierre  Assistant Deputy Minister, Acquisitions Branch, Department of Public Works and Government Services
François Guimont  Deputy Minister and Deputy Receiver General for Canada, Department of Public Works and Government Services
Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Michel Marcotte

10:20 a.m.

Minister of Public Works and Government Services

Michael Fortier

Those are two very distinct items in Mr. Guimont's budget.

10:20 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Diane Marleau

Thank you, Ms. Bourgeois.

Mr. Angus.

10:20 a.m.

NDP

Charlie Angus NDP Timmins—James Bay, ON

Thank you, Mr. Minister and Madam Chair.

Could you give me a sense of when this fairness monitor is invoked? Is there a threshold or is there not?

10:20 a.m.

Minister of Public Works and Government Services

Michael Fortier

Usually a fairness monitor is hired--I guess that's the right word--or used at the beginning of a contractual process. As to examples where it was used at the beginning of a process, I could talk about the real estate, the Royal LePage, issue. The contracts go out and then they come back, and there's an issue, so they have to go back out again. That's when one would have a fairness monitor.

I believe we had a fairness monitor--correct me if I'm wrong--on the military procurement on the C-17. Did we?

10:20 a.m.

NDP

Charlie Angus NDP Timmins—James Bay, ON

At what threshold do you bring it in, or is it just depending?

10:20 a.m.

Minister of Public Works and Government Services

Michael Fortier

It's a risk analysis. It's not just a monetary threshold.

10:20 a.m.

NDP

Charlie Angus NDP Timmins—James Bay, ON

There is no monetary threshold.

You're telling me that the fairness monitor is only there at the beginning. Is that to make sure that the contract's terms are fair?

10:20 a.m.

Minister of Public Works and Government Services

Michael Fortier

Yes, that the process is fair. That's right.

10:20 a.m.

NDP

Charlie Angus NDP Timmins—James Bay, ON

The process is fair.

10:20 a.m.

Minister of Public Works and Government Services

Michael Fortier

There is a policy, which we will table with you, Madam Chair, and your clerk, that we don't have with us right now.

10:20 a.m.

NDP

Charlie Angus NDP Timmins—James Bay, ON

Okay.

When a contract is awarded, the unsuccessful bidder is given a debriefing. It's not just a professional courtesy; it's actually in the procurement rules: “...on request of a supplier whose tender was not selected for award, provide pertinent information to that supplier concerning the reasons for not selecting its tender, the relevant characteristics and advantages of the tender selected and the name of the winning supplier.” That briefing is usually done face-to-face. That wasn't done in the case of the CGI-TPG contract. Why not?

10:20 a.m.

Deputy Minister and Deputy Receiver General for Canada, Department of Public Works and Government Services

François Guimont

I'll turn to my colleague Liliane.

10:20 a.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Acquisitions Branch, Department of Public Works and Government Services

Liliane saint pierre

Yes, you are right in the sense of the normal practices related to providing the right to the supplier to get a debriefing. The supplier has choices, either a debriefing or information via letter, depending on the circumstances. In this specific case, because we were already involved with some challenges related to the trade tribunal, the supplier was provided information via letter.

10:20 a.m.

NDP

Charlie Angus NDP Timmins—James Bay, ON

A letter?

10:20 a.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Acquisitions Branch, Department of Public Works and Government Services

Liliane saint pierre

Yes, with the results of the evaluation.

10:20 a.m.

NDP

Charlie Angus NDP Timmins—James Bay, ON

A $400 million contract that was very controversial, and they got a letter. They didn't get any kind of debriefing.

10:20 a.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Acquisitions Branch, Department of Public Works and Government Services

Liliane saint pierre

If he had specifically requested and I could really verify on the file—

10:20 a.m.

NDP

Charlie Angus NDP Timmins—James Bay, ON

They had specifically requested.

10:20 a.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Acquisitions Branch, Department of Public Works and Government Services

Liliane saint pierre

I can confirm to you that the results of his evaluation were provided via letter.

10:20 a.m.

Minister of Public Works and Government Services

Michael Fortier

With respect, what Madame saint pierre is saying is that when a potential supplier decides to seek redress from the courts, the process of having face-to-face...that option doesn't exist, but we do reply to their questions in writing. Is that correct?

10:20 a.m.

Assistant Deputy Minister, Acquisitions Branch, Department of Public Works and Government Services

10:20 a.m.

NDP

Charlie Angus NDP Timmins—James Bay, ON

My understanding is that in this case they were attempting to meet. They went the court route because basically your department shut them down. I'm just trying to establish this in terms of what the taxpayer is going to be on the hook for if your department did not do its job.

I have another question. Did your staff attempt to hire TPG employees to complete the CGI contract, yes or no?

10:25 a.m.

Minister of Public Works and Government Services

Michael Fortier

My staff or the department?

10:25 a.m.

NDP

Charlie Angus NDP Timmins—James Bay, ON

Your department.

10:25 a.m.

Minister of Public Works and Government Services

Michael Fortier

François will answer.