Well, no, because, you see, the CITT gets to make up when the clock starts. The wording is to the effect that when you might reasonably have known that you were disadvantaged.... To go back to the first CITT complaint we filed, I was just amazed that anyone could make a decision like they did.
The first of the two cases was about Mr. Danek being in a conflict of interest. We filed this after we heard that we'd lost the RFP. Now, if I had filed it in June, when they said I should, when he was hired, I would have been really unpopular in there, okay? So here are the guys who are going to be doing the evaluation and you're going to really upset them.
The second case was about Mr. Chenier telling me of this reconfirmation. Now, I have no idea what a reconfirmation is or whether it was of any significance at all. He told me that on November 22. CITT said I should have filed a CITT complaint then. But it's just not a practical thing to do.
The problem with that process is that CITT can look back and say that's when the clock should have started. It's not something I would be aware of or even have dreamed of doing. So we took that to Federal Court, which said that CITT had been patently unreasonable in making that decision.