I hope that offer is taken up, because I think that would be valuable.
On the other item, I'm concerned, and I don't know if you share my concern, going back to the point that was made with respect to consultation with the first nations. We had a Federal Court judge rule that consultations did not occur. The challenge to that was that a meeting may have taken place and it says consultation occurred. I agree that consultation can mean a number of things, but you said a minimum of one meeting occurred. That probably isn't the case.
My concern is that if the government's position on consultation with first nations is that a Federal Court judge's decision is irrelevant, and they still feel that they have had adequate consultation, then within the phase two properties--and in fact even within these properties that are impacted with first nations groups--do we not run the same risk that we're going to get other injunctions and other problems going forward?