It would certainly be part of their overall analysis, I suspect, at DPW or the Department of Finance, who would be the ones responsible for this type of a long-term transaction, but we haven't done it. In some sense it's not the union's responsibility to worry about the 25 years out. They're worried about losing the buildings now and in the second tranche, and that's where their concerns are.
On December 5th, 2007. See this statement in context.