I see no evidence of that. I just see evidence of carelessness in putting together their spreadsheet and not making sure the data they have is properly aligned. But I have no sense that the numbers they're using were incorrect, in some sense, from the basic information that was provided.
I just think what they did was not skilful or not analytically correct. It's not enough to make you say the whole piece is garbage, but it's something that does make you worry about what's underlying it.