We appreciate the fact that there has been such significant improvement within your own department, and other departments as well, and we appreciate your efforts to be open and transparent in that manner.
I'm reluctant to ask the question because I don't know the answer—people always say don't ask the question unless you know the answer or have a good idea—but is there any ongoing discussion with regard to the frustration many people have when they receive a document they've requested through access to information and find significant portions of the document are blacked out?
We saw this most recently in a document that came from the NCC, and it was surrounding the improvements to 24 Sussex. Something that you and I—or maybe not you and I, but many people around this table—might find frustrating is that there were significant portions blacked out on issues that I think would be generally considered relatively harmless. The average person, certainly the average parliamentarian, gets frustrated when they see large segments of a document blacked out. Is there any effort to address that concern and possibly rethink the amount that's blacked out?
The sense is that in order to get the documents out the door, there's a decision just simply to black out significant portions just in case they might be problematic, rather than erring on the side of full disclosure.