Evidence of meeting #11 for Government Operations and Estimates in the 40th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was departments.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Alister Smith  Assistant Secretary, Expenditure Management Sector, Treasury Board Secretariat
Richard Botham  Director, Microeconomic Policy Analysis, Economic Development and Corporate Finance, Department of Finance
Bob Hirst  Executive Director, Assets and Acquired Services, Government Operations Sector, Treasury Board Secretariat
Shirley Jen  Senior Director, Real Property and Material Policy Division, Treasury Board Secretariat
Lydia Scratch  Committee Researcher

11:55 a.m.

NDP

Paul Dewar NDP Ottawa Centre, ON

I'm just trying to be plain-spoken here.

So that's less money.

11:55 a.m.

Assistant Secretary, Expenditure Management Sector, Treasury Board Secretariat

Alister Smith

Yes.

For them to determine the 5%, it may be that those proposals are not fully accepted--

11:55 a.m.

NDP

Paul Dewar NDP Ottawa Centre, ON

No, you were clear on that.

11:55 a.m.

Assistant Secretary, Expenditure Management Sector, Treasury Board Secretariat

Alister Smith

--so you end up with less than 5%.

Indeed, I will just add that there are reinvestments as well, which have, for the first two rounds, counterbalanced the reallocations. There are no net savings, as such, from strategic reviews.

11:55 a.m.

NDP

Paul Dewar NDP Ottawa Centre, ON

That leads me to my next question. The previous government had $2 billion--I remember this well--booked into government operations that weren't realized that this government inherited. I won't get into the whole A.T. Kearney mess and the $24 million for which we got zero value for money. But I will say this: when a government books savings, that means it's your job to go and find them, and when they're not met, someone has to pay. There's no free money here, as you know.

My concern is that if you're being told to go and find these savings--or departments are required to, sorry, let me put it that way--and government priorities....

Just for those who might take the opportunity to listen to us, “government priorities” means what you've been told by the government to go and find--in other words, savings and money.

In this case, we're talking about booking into their budget to the tune of.... Well, it depends on which numbers you're looking at, but I have $4.3 billion. I guess that was the fiscal update number.

To Mr. Botham, is it still $4.3 billion for this year, combining the two? Is that the number you're using, operationally speaking?

11:55 a.m.

Director, Microeconomic Policy Analysis, Economic Development and Corporate Finance, Department of Finance

Richard Botham

The number in the update, you're right, is $4.3 billion for 2009-2010.

11:55 a.m.

NDP

Paul Dewar NDP Ottawa Centre, ON

That's what I have right here.

11:55 a.m.

Director, Microeconomic Policy Analysis, Economic Development and Corporate Finance, Department of Finance

Richard Botham

The document in front of you probably outlines, at least two lines above that, the source.

11:55 a.m.

NDP

Paul Dewar NDP Ottawa Centre, ON

Yes, $2 billion and $2.3 billion.

11:55 a.m.

Director, Microeconomic Policy Analysis, Economic Development and Corporate Finance, Department of Finance

Richard Botham

Right. That's both savings from the way the government manages its operations—

11:55 a.m.

NDP

Paul Dewar NDP Ottawa Centre, ON

And that's what you're using as your target now.

11:55 a.m.

Director, Microeconomic Policy Analysis, Economic Development and Corporate Finance, Department of Finance

Richard Botham

—and then the second line, being $2.3 billion, includes both strategic review and corporate assets.

11:55 a.m.

NDP

Paul Dewar NDP Ottawa Centre, ON

Okay. But I'm just establishing, that's the number you're using still.

11:55 a.m.

Director, Microeconomic Policy Analysis, Economic Development and Corporate Finance, Department of Finance

Richard Botham

That's correct.

11:55 a.m.

NDP

Paul Dewar NDP Ottawa Centre, ON

So it was in the fiscal update, and it's the number you're using right now.

Mr. Chair, we have a pattern here where the previous government tried to find $2 billion and didn't get it done. We're now talking about $4.3 billion. And we're now saying, well, we'll find it through required efficiencies, 5%, and sale of assets.

My concern is that if we don't have a clear indication of what those assets are, and it happens in the summer, let's say, when we're not sitting, we're not going to be able to hold the government to account and keep an eye on taxpayers' money. I would hope that there is an attempt....

You said in the first quarter you would have identified at least the sale of assets. We've already seen estimates of where some of the efficiencies are, so some of that work is done. I just hope we don't get into a scenario where we end up in July, say, and the list comes out, and there isn't an opportunity for a committee, say, to have oversight on it.

I'll leave it at that. Thank you.

11:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Derek Lee

Thank you, Mr. Dewar. It will perhaps be food for thought for our first meeting in September.

11:55 a.m.

NDP

Paul Dewar NDP Ottawa Centre, ON

We could always have a summer meeting.

11:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Derek Lee

Perhaps we could.

11:55 a.m.

NDP

Paul Dewar NDP Ottawa Centre, ON

I'd be happy to come to Ottawa.

11:55 a.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Derek Lee

All right.

Mr. McTeague, for five minutes.

11:55 a.m.

Liberal

Dan McTeague Liberal Pickering—Scarborough East, ON

Mr. Chair, thank you. I'll be splitting my time with Ms. Hall Findlay.

I have three very quick questions, and you'll probably appreciate the parochial nature of them.

Is there any anticipation from any of you here as to the possible sale of AECL or the government's commercial portions of AECL? Is it on the books? Is it being contemplated? We know a study was commissioned some time ago by one of the banks. Would any of you care to comment on whether or not that is in fact going to take place? Are there any plans to sell part of AECL?

11:55 a.m.

Director, Microeconomic Policy Analysis, Economic Development and Corporate Finance, Department of Finance

Richard Botham

I think it's beyond what we can provide advice on. It's a decision that the government would consider.

11:55 a.m.

Liberal

Dan McTeague Liberal Pickering—Scarborough East, ON

Would the sale of Hibernia be entertained, with the 8.5% crown asset or portion of the value that you have there, or is it not something that falls within your scope at this point?

I understand the reason that you're before the committee, but I think the committee also wants to understand whether or not these are actual requests to sell assets that have legs. It's been reported in the paper. There's a correlation to this, particularly when I look at the price of energy these days again heading up and yesterday's merger between two very large players. The Canadian government has a number of assets that it can liquidate at any given time. Are you familiar with any attempts on that at this point for either AECL or the government's share of Hibernia Oil?

Noon

Director, Microeconomic Policy Analysis, Economic Development and Corporate Finance, Department of Finance

Richard Botham

No, not to execute those transactions. AECL is a crown corporation within the portfolio of NRCan, and Canada's ownership stake in Hibernia, which falls within the Canada Development Investment Corporation, is a crown corporation that is within the purview of the Minister of Finance.

Noon

Liberal

Dan McTeague Liberal Pickering—Scarborough East, ON

I understand.