You're quite correct that there has been an emphasis by the Auditor General and others on the need for better program evaluation and performance management information. And indeed, strategic reviews are intended to build on that kind of evidence base in coming to decisions as to where funding should be better deployed.
So it's very much in line with this that we are trying to build up both the performance management side, performance indicators in departments, and the evaluation side. We have a new evaluation policy, which is moving to a full evaluation of all programs over a five-year period once the new policy is fully phased in. We're trying to encourage, every year, better performance indicators in departments. We have these performance indicators in our RPPs and DPRs, departmental performance reports, and departments are required to report on them; it's mandatory.
So we are indeed moving in exactly that direction.