The way you pose your question is whether I think it's strange or not. I think that the process for a corporate asset has some similarities to the process for a strategic review. There's an understanding that in the case of a strategic review, there's a program spending base. In the context of a corporate asset review, there's an understanding that there is an asset base associated with, in this case, the four departments that are being reviewed. It was taken into account for fiscal prudent planning that there would be a number associated with revenues for one of the outcomes of corporate asset review, which could be a sale. That was the procedure that was followed.
On March 24th, 2009. See this statement in context.