I want to just clarify that my questioning relates to funding coming out of vote 35--the $3 billion specifically. I understand that it applies to the larger amounts in the budget and that the $3 billion is not outside of the budget. My questioning is specifically related to the stress placed on having a $3 billion amount without, for the purpose of speed, the normal pre-approval. It is that focus that I want to insist on in the questioning, although I will also just note, for future reference, your comment that once the allocation is made to a department, you cannot confirm whether a cheque has been cut. It is the department that has to tell us.
In terms of our discussions about witnesses, we had talked about the need to have representatives from each of the departments. Can you tell me right now which of the departments that have had the allocation would be the best for us to be interviewing or to have come as witnesses at this point in time?