I'm not quite sure it's exactly that. As you alluded, we do not second-guess what's in the budget or whether these are stimulative or not or whether they're the right thing to do or not. Our role is to ensure that if indeed there are funding requirements they can be met appropriately, and in this case, vote 35 provides the bridge funding where there are genuine cash requirements that we can't meet through supplementary estimates (A), for instance, or supplementary estimates (B).
So that's really what it is. There's no additional money. There are no additional policy choices being made. It's really a mechanism to bridge fund.