I can't imagine how it will be fruitful to bring in the department heads to go after a specific local example of infrastructure. It's on par with bringing Ruby Dhalla before the immigration committee to study the issue of immigration with a specific example. I think it's wrong in terms of policy-making and will be fruitless. We don't have the expertise or the background knowledge on any specific project to comment on whether it's well done, worthwhile, has merit, or is meeting any kind of target.
We're getting into the kind of micromanagement you've cautioned about many times, Mr. Chair. I don't think it's a good way to go.