Wait. This is not establishing a precedent in respect of how money is spent or how money is reported back to Parliament. The precedent that it is establishing, if any, is that it is a central vote designed to get the money out April 1 instead of June 30.
If the House said no, sorry, you can't have that central vote on April 1, what would happen is that it would back up to June 30, and all of those projects would be reported on subsequent to June 30. What we are saying is that we're going to be allocating the projects between April 1 and June 30 and reporting back to Parliament in terms of the allocation.