On the first question, I think the contract does what it is supposed to do and that works well. I know there are some problems. It would be a little naive to ignore that. Comments have been made on certain work. Access to information was in issue. However, if we set those items aside and consider things with a very structured approach, by doing an audit, we see that those people have done a good job and savings have been achieved.
With respect to the fees and percentage, I think, if I am not mistaken, that this is confidential information. From what I understand, the committee is going to have an opportunity to question the people from ProFac Inc. and SNC-Lavalin O&M at an in camera session. Those people may then be able to answer that question themselves. It's not that I'm refusing to answer, rather it's that this information should be provided directly by the company.