Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you, Madam Coady.
To be clear, we love information, so we don't want to cut you off. Our frustration is that we have so little time in order to get the information. In fact it's very refreshing to have you be so keen to volunteer as much information as you have.
I had asked a question in the first round that did not have a chance to be answered, and I will add a second one. The first one referred to the expenditure review report that was done in 2005, which had significant recommendations. I wanted to know what, if any, of the recommendations from that report were in fact undertaken at PWGSC.
And the second question is that the Auditor General, as you know, issued a report relatively recently, a relatively scathing report on information technology. PWGSC did not escape the review. Some significantly challenging comments were made by the Auditor General.
I note the one area in the PWGSC numbers for the main estimates that is actually proposed to go down is information technology. That is of significant concern, particularly in light of the Auditor General's report.
If you could answer both of those questions, I'd much appreciate it.