That was one of the situations we grappled with on April 8. Mr. Gillani had made representations that he was represented legally by Mr. Alfred Apps at Fasken Martineau. I did some investigating and found out that indeed Mr. Apps did work for Mr. Gillani. In fact, Mr. Gillani had paid a retainer to Fasken Martineau with respect to litigating one of Mr. Gillani's previous victims into bankruptcy. The counterclaim to that action was a cookie cutter for Mr. Gillani's other fraudulent business activities. That case was transferred from Fasken Martineau to another Toronto law firm to litigate. I've actually tracked down the email in which Mr. Gillani discusses with counsel of the other firm the transfer of the retainer from Fasken to their firm.
Mr. Apps had been Mr. Gillani's counsel in that matter and in fact helped to construct one of the issues. One of the fears my client had was of being litigated by Mr. Gillani and Mr. Apps when they came forward, as he did bankrupt the other victim.
In that matter, that case is an Ontario Superior Court case, 07-CV-329370PD3, and the counterclaim to that action from the defendants is, as I said, the cookie cutter for how these other frauds were committed. The email attached to the back of it in the affidavit refers back to the issue at Fasken, and I did call Fasken and spoke with a clerk with respect to identifying their case file representing Mr. Gillani.
The issue my client dealt with on the day was that as things spiralled out of control here in Ottawa and Mr. Ignatieff was calling on the Prime Minister for information on Ms. Guergis.... I mean, eight days before, he was calling for the woman's head on a platter, and now he was taking certain conduct.... My clients were getting more and more nervous, knowing full well that Mr. Apps was the getaway driver for Mr. Gillani in a previous encounter.
I did research this morning, and apparently this court file is missing from the Toronto courthouse, but, luckily enough, I have a copy of it.