Mr. Chairman, I know there are some inquiries of various organizations in respect of some of the specific tactics used in the G-8 or G-20, or alleged to have been used in them. Those will ultimately go forward, and there will be a finding at some point. So I'm not going to comment on those issues.
In terms of putting in place adequate security for a meeting of virtually all of the senior government leaders for most of the world, if you don't provide security for it, that's a very tempting soft target. So by definition, it's essential that we provide security for an event like that to ensure that it is in fact a hard target, and unfortunately that is a costly endeavour in the modern world. Particularly after 9/11, there is no question that security standards have gone up, and many leaders will simply not come to a meeting at which adequate security doesn't exist.
In this case, I think the security plan was a solid one. I think it was carried out effectively. As I said, there may be some specific aspects that will come under review, and people will ultimately make findings on those, but I think overall the summit security was entirely appropriate.