I'm going to speak against the subamendment and on the very fact that if something comes back from the subcommittee to the parent committee, and it's not something that the majority agrees with when it comes back out, we could spend one meeting or maybe multiple meetings discussing it. It could be debated and debated and we wouldn't actually get to the work of the committee, when we know what the end of that discussion is going to be anyway.
We'd rather get down to and work on the business of what we should be working on. That's where I see the subcommittee having the one extra government member saving us a lot of time and allowing us to do the work that Canadians want us to do.
