On this side, there's always a concern about ensuring that people are getting their money's worth when the government undertakes expenses. This is a considerable project, and it involves a lot of money and contracts. Our experience in Quebec has shown us that the multiplication of contracts and the loss of internal expertise can often lead to collusion. To reward friends, for example, they're given contracts, but there isn't really work being done. A situation where the mass is so sizeable can open the door to this kind of gift, which doesn't really correspond with the objectives of the project.
Do you think there is a risk of this becoming an open bar? We're dealing here with the IT sector and not construction, but the same type of situation could occur in the context of this megaproject.