We did have about $60 million in cost savings, but we did not set out to actually reduce our numbers. During that two-year period we actually didn't move anyone out of the organization at all. We actually committed that we would wait until.... We kind of put a three-year time window on it and said that everybody's job was protected for those three years and we were going to make sure they still had work.
Since then, obviously it's allowed us to rationalize, and there has been some downsizing of people. But frankly, most of the $16-odd-million we saved in staff costs was a result of actually going the other way. We actually removed huge numbers of fee-for-service consultants, which are enormously expensive. The management board of cabinet actually gave us approval to increase our FTE count. In return, I think the number we're saving right now is somewhere around $65 million a year—not just in this exercise but across the whole IT organization—by actually moving from fee for service to an FTE count. It's mostly through that exercise that we had staff saving costs.