Thank you for that helpful clarification.
I also have a question about the considerable reduction in capital investment over the last two years or so. I asked Ms. Ambrose a similar question when she appeared. I would have also liked to put the question to Mr. Clement, but he has a busy schedule, and I understand that. In terms of capital investment, the amount is 4% lower than it was before the economic action plan was implemented. However, the wind-down of the economic action plan cannot explain that. We feel that reducing capital investment is tantamount to putting off investments that will have to be made eventually.
If you decide to stop upgrading or maintaining a bridge, that bridge's need for upgrades and maintenance won't be reduced. You will have to play catch up later on. The bridge's lifespan will not magically increase. Instead, it will decrease if the bridge is not properly maintained. Is that really a good way to save money? If not, is it just a way of putting off investments that will eventually be necessary?