I don't know that I have questions, but I have a couple of observations, following on previous questions and answers from my colleagues.
Early on in our study, the observation was made that it wasn't for lack of information that we decided to do this study. There was more than enough information. The issue was to connect the dots or make the linkages. For example, with the tax expenditures, did we know that there was something posted on the website about the effectiveness of those tax expenditures? Did we know it's considered a best practice to do that? I think this has been very helpful.
More to the point, I would disagree with my colleague, who characterized this study as trying to improve the quality of information. I think we have lots of good information; it's about being able to make those linkages. I think that's what's been really important about this study.