Thanks, Mr. Chair. That's a good question. It saves me asking it.
I'll not get into the case, but I am going to relay a finding of the court. My question follows after that. The court felt it was imperative that a thorough investigation be carried out on how far up the bureaucratic chain the knowledge of this activity went, that it was particularly important to ensure the integrity of the Auditor General. It also found some of the testimony of Public Works officials to be, in their quotes, “less than truthful”.
My question to you is this. This matter is under appeal. Potentially, it could be under appeal again if the government is not satisfied with the ruling of the appellate division. Are you going to move expeditiously on the recommendation of the court, or is that going to be awaiting all of these appeals, which may be completed well after the procurement bidding process occurs for the next round for this particular activity?