Perhaps we're both right, because I don't think you disagreed with me when I said the Auditor General said that part of the $3.1 billion problem was transfers from one program to another. Had the government been voting according to program in those years, the officials would have been obliged to better monitor that money, because that's the money on which the votes are based, and I think we might have had less of a problem with the $3.1 billion. That's another argument to go in the direction we're proposing.
On May 28th, 2013. See this statement in context.