I really appreciate your contribution, but sometimes it's a little hard to get down to the meat of the issue.
For me the meat of the issue is who makes the decision about what a high priority health regulation is, what a low priority one is, which one should be considered for elimination, and which one shouldn't be considered for elimination. If I understand what you're saying, there's an internal decision made, and then that recommendation is brought to the minister and the minister decides whether or not the regulation can be eliminated.
What ensures that the identification is correct? How do you classify certain regulations as being really important and certain ones as not important under the pressure of having to eliminate them?