To get a really good understanding of the spending at VIA Rail over the last several years—and I will eventually turn to my colleague for some additional information—let me say, Mr. Chair, that VIA has had some additional cashflow from the federal government over the last few years, from time to time, because of shortfalls in their pension. There was a need, from a statutory perspective, to provide additional funding for their pensions. That was part of the story.
Some intensive capital injections have also occurred in the past—not one-time funding, but certainly higher in some years than was planned for on an ongoing basis. It is actually okay to say that there's a one-time investment of this amount, and the ongoing investment will be less, so you saw a spike in the capital investment.
Those are the two things, off the top of my head. I will turn to my colleague to see whether there is anything else.