I'll keep it very brief.
I would agree. Our focus would be more on a multi-ministerial approach, to ensure that there are different voices at the table. I think that a sort of “all roads lead to INAC” mentality has settled in. We've seen that people are trying to break that up. There is Public Works, and there is Infrastructure. There are more folks involved, but I don't think all conversations should end at INAC.
We would strongly support what the Tlicho were saying, about the need for measurable teeth in procurement policy. Whichever way we go, that is something we really need to see more of.