Ms. Orser, you talked about the U.S. set-aside program as an objective for Canada, and then you also mentioned the 25%. However, there was the concern of lack of credibility because of the lack of monitoring with it.
What I understand is that in the United States and Australia, they have targets for the proportion of the procurement, while the United Kingdom has a target for the procurement value.
It goes back a little to my earlier question. Is there a preference? If we were to establish a target, how do we ensure we get the monitoring right?