That's what the law is supposed to be.
To Mr. Boissonnault's comment about procurement, we were studying it and we heard very clearly from the bureaucrats that, no, we're following the law. Then we'd have all these identified groups saying, no, you're not, so it's not just for hiring vets.
Our first set of witnesses talked about the U.S. system where they have the equivalency of skills. We've heard from previous vets about BCIT in Burnaby, which has a similar set-up. To me, just looking at it, the biggest first step we could take would be to have something like that, to have the skill equivalency, so that they cannot shoot you down for having crisis communications and not emergency communications. Is that a fair idea? Are we on the right track to maybe focus on that as a priority?