It's a public-private partnership in the formal sense. In this case, there's a major risk transferred to the private sector, because they actually provide not only the financing, but, really, they own the facility. What they're committing to is a performance-measured operations availability to SSC, and their payments only start being made once the facility is available. If there is a delay, they don't get paid, and yet they're funding the construction up front. More importantly, if the facility isn't available to SSC and doing what it's supposed to do every month, then there would be subtractions from what they receive.
That's over a 25-year operating phase agreement, following the three-year construction plan. That's what the P3 brings to the table.
Now, as I said, we do close to 2,000 infrastructure projects a year. We've done a handful of P3s. So it's still not the preferred approach for every project.