That is a good question, Mr. Duvall.
As we explained earlier, the economic situation in New Brunswick is perhaps different from that in other provinces. The circumstances of the population are not as good as in certain other provinces. So when we are asked whether we are ready to pay more for this or that service, the answer is not simple. It is often nuanced.
We've been talking about statistics, but we must not forget that at this time—we think this is an important point—New Brunswick is the province with the most elderly population: 19% of the population is 65 or more, as compared to the Canadian average which is 16%. By 2036, 29.7% of the population of New Brunswick will be seniors. Some people will live longer.
Mobility is always an issue, especially in rural areas, where 60% of our population lives. They have to have access to service at a reasonable cost. As Mr. Kmiec was saying, these people might be willing to accept a compromise and have less frequent mail delivery.
I was talking about transition earlier. I am convinced that the matter of transition has to be examined in the context of any decrease in service or proposal Canada Post will be making to the government. How will we make the transition? It should not happen all at once, in a shocking manner. It should be done one element or one sector at a time.
As Ms. Gammon pointed out, we are learning things about Canada Post today. This means there is a deficiency somewhere. We are very involved with the associations, but we did not know that Canada Post provided door-to-door delivery to people with impaired mobility. There is something missing in the communication with people. As Ms. Gammon said, people aren't always aware of that.