I am generally aware it's the same as in Canada. I'm in the other half of the camp. I have confidence in the people and the government, who are working all these issues and have decided that a particular one is an issue of security. There are all kinds of processes in the government, and particularly in the American one. It's a maze of steps, hurdles, and hoops they have to go through. There are a bunch of processes and explanations, as well as internal scrutiny.
In terms of Australia and the U.K., which have governments akin to ours, there is very active involvement of Parliament and committees of Parliament. Even in Canada, we have a number of committees in Parliament that, in my view, are capable of addressing a question as it's coming up. It depends on the committee and the specific issue at hand, but you all have the capability to do that.
On top of that, we have any kind of an external review, which our panellists have spoken about. The tools are in place, and I have always been a fan of using the tools and regulations that you have, and not attempting to add to them.