I think my colleague from Health Canada had started to address this. Under the legislation, our forecasting right now for the one-for-one rule is that it is sustainable in the medium to long term in terms of its stated purpose—permitting departments to go back through their stock of regulations and net those out should they need to apply administrative burden and new regulations.
The question becomes one of sustainability, if you were to move to a two-to-one rule or a three-to-one rule and place departments or portfolios in a place where they would have to make balancing acts between this safety requirement and this other safety requirement, and which safety requirement is more important than another. That would be a tough balancing act for those departments that have those mandates.