From a policy perspective, in looking at what other countries have done, a number of countries were ahead of Canada in terms of introducing a one-for-one rule. Some of them went to a two-for-one rule. In Britain, they actually went for a three-for-one rule and then have subsequently rolled those back or eliminated them.
It's a question of a balancing act of looking at the experiences in other jurisdictions as to how well those rules have performed, what really came out of those rules and how they were administered. It's a little different in every jurisdiction.
We continue to watch what is happening in British Columbia. However, again, this review by this committee and the recommendations that this committee may make are very welcome, both to the government and to those of us working within the Treasury Board Secretariat, in terms of—