Certainly, there is always a danger that an individual, rather than a lack of transparency, is being attacked.
From what I hear today, there are no attacks that target the individual. I would like this to be confirmed or denied. I want to be certain that these attacks are aimed not at the individual, but rather at the lack of access to complete information.
I also want to make sure that the ethical rules of Parliament have not been broken. A parliamentarian may not hire their sister or daughter, for example. We sometimes say that what is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander. The important thing, in my opinion, is that the person not be attacked.
I cannot do anything about the fact that an individual is a bitcoin expert. If he was advised to become a speaker because he was a bitcoin expert, that is fine.
I simply want there to be transparency, and no personal attacks.