Likewise for Mr. Jowhari. I see your hand's down, Mr. Jowhari.
We will wait until we get that amendment distributed. Just hold on, everyone, please.
Evidence of meeting #1 for Government Operations and Estimates in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was amendment.
A recording is available from Parliament.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Robert Gordon Kitchen
Likewise for Mr. Jowhari. I see your hand's down, Mr. Jowhari.
We will wait until we get that amendment distributed. Just hold on, everyone, please.
The Clerk
Mr. Chair, the amendment has been distributed to the members. You may continue with the debate.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Robert Gordon Kitchen
Thank you.
I'll give people just a minute to read that.
Mr. Paul-Hus, perhaps you could just clarify where you would like that put in the motion, so we know exactly where it sits.
The Clerk
Mr. Chair, my understanding is that the text of Mr. Paul-Hus, which was distributed, would be added to the end of the motion.
Is that right, Mr. Paul‑Hus?
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Robert Gordon Kitchen
Thank you for that clarification.
I hope everyone has had a chance to read the amendment that's being proposed. We will have a discussion on it at this point in time.
Mr. Kusmierczyk.
Liberal
Irek Kusmierczyk Liberal Windsor—Tecumseh, ON
I apologize. I have a comment on the motion, not on the amendment.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Robert Gordon Kitchen
Is there any further discussion on the amendment?
Mr. Housefather, you just raised your hand. Is that correct?
Liberal
Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, QC
Yes, Mr. Chair.
I would like to have slightly more time to read it. It just arrived in my inbox.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Robert Gordon Kitchen
Okay. We will give you a minute or two then.
Everyone, we will hold off for a bit.
How are we doing, Mr. Housefather? Are you good?
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Robert Gordon Kitchen
For my own clarification, too, Mr. Paul-Hus, in your discussion of the amendment you were talking about the change from “come from Quebec and/or Canadian companies”.
Was that correct? Is it just changing that wording? I wanted to be clear that this was part of your amendment as well.
The Clerk
Mr. Chair, if I may, I had an opportunity to confer with Mr. Paul-Hus and clarified this.
He suggests removing the words “Quebec and/or” before the word “Canadian”, so it would read as “come from Canadian companies”. The same change would be made in the French.
Then he is proposing as well adding the text that was distributed to the members of the committee a few moments ago.
Thank you.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Robert Gordon Kitchen
Thank you, Mr. Clerk.
Again, I wanted that clarification so that everyone would understand this. Everyone, hopefully, heard the part that we would remove “Quebec and/or”. It would say “from Canadian companies” and then the added part you have all received.
With that said, Mr. Housefather, I see your hand is up.
Liberal
Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, QC
Mr. Chair, in order to reach a consensus in the committee, we could say “Canadian companies, including those from Quebec” so that Quebec is referred to.
Obviously, Quebec companies are also Canadian. In English, we would say: “Canadian companies, including those from Quebec.” In French, we would say: “les entreprises canadiennes, y inclus celles du Québec.” I believe that this would be closer to what Ms. Vignola wanted and that it would allow for a consensus.
We could see what Mr. Paul‑Hus proposes.
Thank you.
Conservative
The Chair Conservative Robert Gordon Kitchen
Thank you, Mr. Housefather.
I see Ms. Vignola's hand is up.
Mr. Paul-Hus, are you comfortable with what Mr. Housefather has said on that?
December 16th, 2021 / 12:05 p.m.
Conservative
Pierre Paul-Hus Conservative Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles, QC
I think that the clerk wants to talk to you.
Conservative
The Clerk
I was asking if Mr. Housefather is effectively moving a subamendment and could I get the text of what he plans to move, or if he is asking for unanimous consent for Mr. Paul-Hus to amend his original amendment.
I just want to know what Mr. Housefather—
Liberal
Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, QC
I was not proposing a subamendment. I was suggesting to Mr. Paul-Hus that this wording may be preferable to Madame Vignola's and that we may have a consensus on it if he used it. It's totally up to him how he words the amendment.
Thank you.
Conservative
Pierre Paul-Hus Conservative Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles, QC
I would like to say something, Mr. Chair.
I have no problem with that. Of course, we'll be delighted to see in Ottawa the Quebec companies that manufacture masks, if there are any such companies, or companies from other parts of Canada. It doesn't matter.
The important thing is to get rid of the masks that come from abroad.
Thank you.
The Clerk
Mr. Chair, I apologize for intervening again.
Mr. Housefather, could I just get the text of what you had suggested? It went by a little fast for me. I do apologize for that.
What were you suggesting?
Liberal
Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, QC
I was suggesting that we say “Canadian companies, including those from Quebec”.
In French, we would say: “les entreprises canadiennes, y inclus celles du Québec.”