If we start with the Botler allegations, I believe PSPC reviewed those. I believe they did a legal assessment and told Botler that this was a private sector matter. I believe CBSA, through Botler's own testimony, told Botler the same thing. I hope that clears up that point.
With respect to the Auditor General and the procurement ombud's report, with respect to my time and tenure at the CBSA, I don't think I was named as having done anything wrong. I don't think any public servants were named as doing anything wrong by the procurement ombud. I don't know of any wrongdoing. I certainly did not witness any and I wouldn't have stood for it had I seen it.
Frankly, maybe I'll pass it to Mr. Utano for the other two years that ArriveCAN was there. From what I understand and the reviews that were done, there were some questions between contract 1 and contract 2. I've clearly stated that we were responsible for contract 1. The justification for contract 2 was written by the business and was signed off by the CFO. It was sent over to PSPC and they signed off on it, and they indicated that they already had a contractor in mind for that work.
For contract 3, it would make no sense to go with a different vendor—as I explained, it doesn't make sense to hire a different plumber to do more work in your bathroom than you originally engaged for—but PSPC did insist on a new contract.
I'll leave it at that. That was the only thing I was there for.
Mr. Utano, go ahead, please.