Thanks for the question.
This is the ironic part about Mr. Lafleur being the lead investigator. Mr. Lafleur was actually part of the vetting process for Botler when we decided on the scope.
The initial proposal was for them to do a feasibility study with six milestones and do a small regional pilot. HR and security decided against doing the pilot, which is why you'll see prior emails from me to Ritika Dutt saying that we want to do all of this. It was after their demo and the president's decision that HR came back and said that they only wanted to do the feasibility study, so that was what was contracted.
It was after the kickoff that Ritika Dutt wrote to John Ossowski directly—she didn't include me or Mr. Utano—and said that Justice Canada had approved this pilot and that they wanted CBSA to take it on. This is where they would monetize their Botler for Citizens to move into “Botler for workplace”. I think this is why they testified that they were going to make $28 million a year across the government. It was because they were trying to position their tool to be one for internal government workplaces and they would get paid on licensing.