First of all, I want to say thank you for respecting that privacy. It's meaningful to both of us.
It appears to us that somebody who knew us basically just went into our emails after consultations occurred and just started collecting things and putting things together with a narrative and a storyline that indicates wrongdoing.
Not only is the entire document couched in words that would make you believe something was wrong, but there's also “could have” or “might have”. These are not facts at all.
I just want to remind this committee that when Mr. Lafleur—who is not the lead investigator, but the executive director of the team—came here, he admitted that these were allegations. Even Ms. O'Gorman referred to these being at a point in time, so the question is that if this is a point-in-time document, why did they decide to release it at that time to our bosses and have us suspended with pay? Why would Erin O'Gorman make a phone call to our bosses? That's not a formal thing to do when you're dealing with such a serious subject.
How come there's no writing? How come there's no email or documentation that shows what she talked about with our bosses?