Evidence of meeting #106 for Government Operations and Estimates in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was benefits.

A video is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Ms. Nancy Vohl

11 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

I call this meeting to order. Welcome to meeting number 106 of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates.

The committee is resuming its study on the changeover of the public service health care plan from Sun Life to Canada Life. Then at the very end, as I had mentioned, we promised Ms. Vignola a couple of weeks ago that we would get to her motion. As soon as we're done, we'll attend to the production order motion that Ms. Vignola had.

Pursuant to Standing Order 108(2) and the motion adopted by the committee on Tuesday, October 17, 2023, the committee is meeting on the study of the changeover of the public service health care plan from Sun Life to Canada Life. I will remind everyone as always not to have your earpieces next to the microphones as it causes feedback and potential injury to our very valued interpreters.

We have Ms. Hart and Mr. Sazant with us today.

I understand you have an opening statement for us, sir. Please go ahead. The floor is yours.

11 a.m.

Seth Sazant

Thank you very much.

Good morning everyone.

My name is Seth Sazant. I'm a pension and benefits officer and negotiator with the Public Service Alliance of Canada. I'm appearing on behalf of our national president, Chris Aylward. With me is my colleague, Sasha Hart, who is the PSAC general counsel.

Thank you, Mr. Chair, for the opportunity to speak on this very important matter.

Of our 225,000 members, the majority work for the federal government, where the benefits are provided through the public service health care plan. In addition, hundreds of thousands of retirees who are former PSAC members are members of the same plan. While we negotiated the terms of the plan itself, it's the employer's obligation to administer and to provide those benefits. On July 1, 2023, Canada Life took over the administration of the plan. Since that time, to say that things have been a total mess is an understatement.

The ability of our members to contact Canada Life for routine issues, questions and reimbursement for regular services has appeared to improve. However, many problems remain. We believe that there need to be discussions on ways to make things right for what has gone on and to fix the existing problems. Phoenix was bad enough. Our members have dealt with not getting paid properly or on time for years. Now accessing their benefits has become incredibly difficult. The employer has repeatedly fallen down on providing the basics of compensation for our members.

I would ask the committee members to consider some of the following situations. Each one is a real life situation of a PSAC member or retiree who has contacted us asking for help.

One member who suffers from a neurological disease was unable to complete positive enrolment and couldn't get in touch with Canada Life to fix the issue. As a result, they discontinued their pharmacotherapy, suffered from multiple seizures and were hospitalized. A cancer patient who requires biological therapy medication that costs $5,000 a month had their claim seamlessly covered with Sun Life, but then it was denied by Canada Life. They ran out of medication because they couldn't reach anyone at Canada Life and they couldn't afford the out-of-pocket costs. Another member's spouse requires medication that cost $2,300 per month. It was covered without issue previously. Canada Life then halted their coverage and months of unresponsiveness led to over $8,000 in out-of-pocket expenses.

I would ask you to put yourself in these people's shoes and imagine the stress and difficulty. These members should have been focused on fighting their diseases, but instead they were needlessly spending time agonizing over how to get their medicines covered. For some this meant a decline in their health.

For months, members who called Canada Life had at best a fifty-fifty chance of even getting into the queue to wait on hold. The other 50% would simply hear a message saying to call back later. For months, the average wait time for those who were lucky to get through was over half an hour. The contract that the government has signed with Canada Life stipulates that over 70% of calls should be answered in 20 seconds or less.

We also saw problems with insufficiently trained agents offering incorrect or misleading information and very slow processing times for claims. Again, the contract stipulates that 95% of claims that are submitted electronically should be processed in five days, but routinely there was a five-week delay.

If Canada Life cannot adhere to the service standards in their contract, they must provide fee credits back to the Government of Canada. They were given a six-month grace period where such credits did not apply. We're still puzzled about why this was allowed to happen. Canada Life forced our members into terrible situations without even coming close to the expected service standards. These standards remain unmet as far as we know, but we haven't been provided with the figures that we need to verify this.

All that said, we're seeing two continued major problems with the administration of this plan.

The first relates to international claims. For members who are posted abroad working in Canada's embassies, consulates, military bases or for anyone who is travelling, the entire system is actually currently down and has been for two weeks. This is a result of a cybersecurity incident. However, even before this complete shutdown, service for members outside of Canada has been a major issue with an enormous backlog of unprocessed claims. There are currently more than 3,500 claims that are over 60 days old waiting to be adjudicated and paid.

The second major problem relates to a process of prior authorization for drugs. This is a new process where people who take certain drugs—usually due to their high cost—must navigate system approvals before any coverage.... This system is failing our members and causing serious health issues for many. I'd be happy to elaborate further if there are questions.

Again, certain problems are definitely getting better, but many problems remain and there isn't an easy fix here. Fundamentally, we believe our members need to be made whole for their pain and suffering, which includes those who have suffered adverse health consequences and those who have suffered financially.

Thank you very much for your time.

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Thank you very much, sir.

We'll start with Mrs. Kusie, please, for six minutes.

11:05 a.m.

Conservative

Stephanie Kusie Conservative Calgary Midnapore, AB

Thank you, Chair.

Thank you very much, Mr. Sazant and Ms. Hart, for being here today. It's very much appreciated.

The negotiations with Canada Life on the new health care agreement were meant to be between the unions, retirees and the Treasury Board. Do you feel your organization was properly included in these conversations and the creation of the new plans and its terms?

11:05 a.m.

Seth Sazant

Thank you very much for the question.

I'd like to differentiate between two separate processes that happened on July 1, 2023.

One process was the implementation of what was negotiated between the parties—the unions, the retirees and Treasury Board—to implement a number of changes to the plan itself. Canada Life was not party to those discussions and had nothing to do with those discussions.

The second change that happened on July 1, 2023, which is at issue here, relates to the change in insurance providers. Sun Life used to administer this plan, and on that same day, again, in a completely different process, Canada Life took over the administration of the plan. What we're hearing in terms of these problems relates to the administration of the claims and the delays in reimbursement of members' claims. On the issue of moving to Canada Life, this was not something that was negotiated. This was not something the unions were party to, nor the retirees. This was a change that was entirely under the purview of the employer.

11:10 a.m.

Conservative

Stephanie Kusie Conservative Calgary Midnapore, AB

Thank you for that.

I'm sure you're aware that this committee has been seized with the ArriveCAN study. Since both of you are here today, I thought I would take the opportunity to ask some questions relative to that study as well. We've been studying the increase in use of both subcontractors and contractors by the government.

What would you say is the feeling of public servants relative to the consistent use of outside contractors instead of relying on internal expertise? Would you have any comments on that given your presence here today?

11:10 a.m.

Seth Sazant

Again, I appreciate the question.

I think as a general principle we've seen lots of difficulties and problems when it comes to the hiring of outside contractors. I do want to caveat here that I'm certainly not an expert on contracting out or contracting in. I can speak to this particular issue, which is the contract with Canada Life or with Sun Life, which is something that has traditionally been done, where there is an outside company that administers and adjudicates benefits. I wouldn't want to get too far into the concept of contracting out or contracting in. That's definitely not something I feel that I'm able to do.

11:10 a.m.

Conservative

Stephanie Kusie Conservative Calgary Midnapore, AB

Certainly, Mr. Sazant, I appreciate that.

Being a pension and benefits officer, I would genuinely feel you have the pulse of the public servants.

It was found that resources used on outside contractors on ArriveCAN were paid almost double the amount per day that public servants were paid for the same work. Has this been an issue that the union has encountered before? Is there any instance you can think of where this has occurred?

11:10 a.m.

Seth Sazant

Again, without speaking to specific examples, I will say that we believe our members provide very good value for money and do excellent work. Oftentimes.... We certainly have seen studies that bringing things back in-house often does save money, rather than cost more money. Again, these are general comments, and I'm going to keep those comments there.

Thank you.

11:10 a.m.

Conservative

Stephanie Kusie Conservative Calgary Midnapore, AB

Certainly.

I'll go back to the plan. Would you say that the members, in your discussions with them, have appreciated the benefit increases, or has this been overshadowed by the major changes to coverage in things like physiotherapy and prescription drugs, for example? Perhaps we'd want to go back to that for a moment, please.

11:10 a.m.

Seth Sazant

The changes in coverage were quite extensive. I think there were over 70 benefit increases that we negotiated to many different provisions. The plan hadn't been updated in any meaningful way since 2006. Some minor changes had occurred since that time, but as I'm sure everyone can imagine, changes to health care provisions.... Costs for health care have increased, and there had not been increases in the plan since 2006, so we did negotiate many increases. In the course of negotiations, there's going to be some give-and-take, of course, and we have certainly heard from members as well. However, on balance, we believe that what we negotiated provides some very strong value for our members.

11:10 a.m.

Conservative

Stephanie Kusie Conservative Calgary Midnapore, AB

Thank you, Mr. Sazant.

In your opening statement, you indicated a recent breach, which is providing difficulty for Canadians posted abroad. As a former diplomat, I'm very troubled by that. With ArriveCAN, we also saw an instance of a lack of security as a result of clearances not being issued. Would you be concerned about increases to security risks due to the continued use of not only contractors but subcontractors as they relate to ArriveCAN and to this breach and the results for public servants abroad?

11:15 a.m.

Seth Sazant

Thank you.

We don't actually know what the breach is at this point. I'm not privy to the information. The union is not privy to any of that information. Obviously, we would expect that these outside companies would take our members' sensitive information quite seriously. We certainly have some concerns over that. However, it has been two weeks that the entire site has now been shut down, and anyone who's travelling abroad or who lives abroad has been unable to put in a reimbursement for their claims. Our primary concern relates to that.

11:15 a.m.

Conservative

Stephanie Kusie Conservative Calgary Midnapore, AB

Thank you for your work.

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

11:15 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

Thank you very much.

Mr. Bains.

11:15 a.m.

Liberal

Parm Bains Liberal Steveston—Richmond East, BC

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Thank you to our guests from the Public Service Alliance of Canada for joining us today.

Can you just explain the plan administrator and the plan itself? You indicated that the union had negotiated a lot of the plan. What part of the plan did it negotiate? Was it the terms, the delivery of it, the benefits or all of the above? Maybe speak to the pieces that you negotiated and then to what is happening with the administration of it.

11:15 a.m.

Seth Sazant

The short answer is yes. The terms of the plan were negotiated jointly between all of the unions with members in the federal public sector, as well as the retirees' organization and the Treasury Board. We negotiate the terms of the plan. Sun Life and Canada Life do not dictate what is covered. That is dictated by the outcome of the negotiations between those parties.

The negotiations for this plan concluded back in August 2022. This was a full 10 months before the changeover from Sun Life to Canada Life. Canada Life knew 18 months before the changeover that it had obtained the contract, so for 18 months it knew it had the contract. Ten months before the implementation of the contract, it knew the exact terms that it would be responsible for adjudicating, so there was significant lead time. When July 1, 2023, came along, there were no surprises to Canada Life at that point, yet the administration of this plan—and people's ability to call in to have their basic questions answered and their claims adjudicated—was just in complete disarray for months.

11:15 a.m.

Liberal

Parm Bains Liberal Steveston—Richmond East, BC

Ultimately, even given that they had such a lead time, for the delivery of the service they were still unable to.... You indicated that the wait times have gotten better. I believe I recall, maybe in the summer, that the wait times were a certain number. Where are we at now with the wait times? Is it 30 minutes on average? Is it less than a minute? Where are we with the wait times on these calls?

11:15 a.m.

Seth Sazant

On the wait times to call into Canada Life, again, there have been significant improvements there.

We're provided with some general information at the union, but we're actually not provided with all of the information that relates to the call centre metrics. As I understand at this point—

11:15 a.m.

Liberal

Parm Bains Liberal Steveston—Richmond East, BC

Do you have an indication of, say, backlogs? Have they caught up? Maybe you could speak a bit about that.

11:15 a.m.

Seth Sazant

Absolutely. I can provide some information on backlogs. We have significant information about backlogs that relate to the international claims. That's one issue that I can certainly speak to right now.

For any international claims, there are currently 7,000 claims that are more than 30 days old that have not been adjudicated. There are 3,500 claims that are more than 60 days old that have not been adjudicated. Certainly, if asked, I can talk about the system of prior authorization, where we have approximately 1,000 claims that have been made that are at least two weeks old—people asking for specific medications—and have not been adjudicated.

When it comes to Canada Life in a more general sense, I'm certainly happy to get back to you on the numbers of exactly what that backlog is.

11:20 a.m.

Liberal

Parm Bains Liberal Steveston—Richmond East, BC

Yes. Could you email the committee in writing on that?

All of those service improvements you were saying...you indicated that they have been made. What are some of the main concerns you're hearing from members in general?

11:20 a.m.

Seth Sazant

Thank you very much for the question.

The issue of coverage for any international issue is a significant issue that we're hearing about. This relates to people who are out of country, whether travelling or posted abroad. This is incredibly problematic because those who are posted abroad—

11:20 a.m.

Liberal

Parm Bains Liberal Steveston—Richmond East, BC

I'm going to stop you there just because of the time. This seems like that's one of your main concerns, because you've mentioned a number of times that for the international piece we're looking at somewhere over 7,000 claims. What concrete actions have been taken to mitigate this now? Have you heard anything? How is Canada Life tackling that now?

11:20 a.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kelly McCauley

You have about 30 seconds for an answer, please.