Going back and picking up on a question that my colleague just asked regarding the mandatory criteria, the Auditor General's report and the procurement ombudsman basically concluded that this is a documentation issue that we're looking at here. Those were the huge gaps that we saw. There weren't any paper trails. The Auditor General called it some of the “worst financial record keeping” that she had seen.
That's the conclusion of both of those independent agencies, but there's one issue that I want to zero in on, because it is more serious than that, and that is the question about your role in drafting the mandatory criteria. The argument from the Auditor General is that this had the potential to artificially reduce competition on the bidding process and, as a result, Canadians would not have received the best value.
I know there are some things you mentioned that you aren't able to respond to right now in terms of who you were involved with directly in designing the “mandatory criteria” that “favoured” GC Strategies. Those were the words of the ombudsman, but can you tell us how often in this line of work a company like yours is involved in designing the mandatory bid criteria?